Job Dilemma....contnue..

So should the management be held accountable for retrenching or sacking the staffs?

When the company doing well and making monies, the management enjoy the benefits and have a big fat bonuses and cars and pat on your back and say well done on your job and gives you "kacang putih" as rewards. BUT when the company is not doing well, the employees "enjoy" all the pains and take away your "kacang putih" and says it cannot be helped-lah, economy bad-lah, what nonsense and injustice is this?

If Karl Marx (if you do not know him, he is the father of communism and states that all man, women, gays and UFO's have equal rights) knew what was going today, he will flip over and over again in his grave. Hei, don't you all ever thing that I am a commi (the terms the American use to refer to a communist), I am far from that. Justice and equality has nothing to do with political or religious issues, it has to do with what is the right thing to do.

Back to the "kacang putih" issues!

So good times the management enjoy, bad times the employee suffers. What happen to when good times all enjoy and bad times all suffer. Never seems to work does it?

This brings me back to the responsibilities of the management. Should they be held accountable for their actions? good times you enjoy, bad times we suffer. The management should have the responsibilities to ensure the welfare of the staff are taken care of. These are heavy responsibilities as it involves the life and future of the staff families. Management cannot say Ooops they make a mistake or they fail to plan for the recession and because of that we have to cut down. Well, "up yours" as the British say. Because of their negligence the employees have to suffer. they have a fiduciary duty towards the general welfare of the employees.

Fiduciary Duty is a term used in law for holding somebody accountable for their negligence.

So does the management have a fiduciary duty towards the employees?
What do you think?

.. to be continue..